That parental relationships, particularly
those between father and son, were significant factors in the majority of
participants present day sense of self, and how they conceived of themselves as
men.
Biddulph argues that a 'father' at its most
extreme, could be considered as being just a sperm donor (1995, p. 105). The act
of 'fathering', however, is much more than this, '... Its an essential part of
raising children of either sex ... [and] ... yet the art of fathering has all
but disappeared ...' (Biddulph 1995, p. 105). Continuing in his assertions,
Biddulph argues that role of the father has in fact sunk to a very low point and
that he believes that
Boys who do not get
very active fathering - either by their own father or someone who is willing to
step in - will never get their lives as men to work. It's as simple and resolute
as that (1995, p. 106).
But also, it is not that simple or resolute,
and there is substantial criticism of this position that should be noted. Elium
and Elium argue that
To grow into a
healthy man, a boy must develop a close bond with his mother, so he learns about
his own humanity; and then he must be taken by his father to discover what it
means to be a man (1992, pp. 91-2).
According to Gilbert and Gilbert,
... new and
courageous ... approaches to mothering are not easily balanced beside many of
the arguments currently advanced about fathering (1998, p. 94).
They argue that this approach has created a
new wave of 'fathering texts' which seem to have developed as an extreme
reaction to feminist approaches, which urge greater emphasis on emotions and
caring, and as a result of immense dissatisfaction with what they have said in
regards to masculinity and gender relations (1995, p. 94).
Segal, taking an approach somewhere between
the feminist arguments and the new 'fathering' approach, asserts that,
We need to break
down many of those barriers between the private and the public, to fashion a
society in which collective provision for individual needs ensures maximum
choices for those caring and being cared for (1997, p, 58),.
As Seidler contends, men need to become much
more in touch with their inner selves before they can hope to forge the kinds of
relationships with others, that fathers are now being pressured to 'build'
(1994, pp. 149-50). With respect to this pressure, he adds, our understanding of
the socialisation process, particularly within social theory, is particularly
narrow and ordered, as it prescribes, particularly for men, what a father should
be, rather then what a father can be.
With regards to women, and in contemporary
Western societies, external pressures, such as financial concerns, are such that
that they are now being made to feel dissatisfied with 'being' a mother.
Increasingly, women are being made to feel that it is no longer possible and
perhaps not even right, to stay at home and 'be' a Mother. Now the question on
everybody's lips when a woman has a child, is 'When are you going back to
work?', as if being at home and being a full-time Mother, are no longer
necessary, justified, nor warranted and in some way offers little or no
fulfillment.
Seidler's sentiments are, I think, much more
in tune with the thematic statement that emerged from this study. As such, and
although my co-investigators each had unique relationships with their parents,
as all children do, each were aware of the fact that they could do something to
alter their own relationships with their families, if they wished to do so. They
understood the pressures being placed on them as men, and were increasingly
aware of the restrictions that these pressures actually wrought, if they
remained unattended. Sometimes, however, it as Townsend notes, where men
... aren't quite
sure what it means to be male. With younger men, traditional aspects of
masculinity such as strength, sportiness and success still matter a great deal,
but amongst older men, where these parameters have fallen away, there is often
confusion or a sense of loss (1994, pp. 284).
For example, Andrew (aged 21) was brought up
in a very stable home, in a typical nuclear family unit. His parents have been
married for 23 years, and as Andrew recalls, have never, to his knowledge, had a
major argument:
My Mum is probably
most like me in character - being generally easy-going, a bit scatty, and having
the same views as me on a lot of topics. My Dad however, is my biggest in terms
of what I enjoy - being keen on the sea, walking, technology and things like
that ... I suppose I don't 'know' my Dad quite as well as my Mum. I tend to have
more personal discussions with my Mum ...with my Dad I talk about hobbies, work,
things like that. I don't know if I would really need to know him better. I say
this because I love him the way he is, and I'm close enough to him to know that
if I really wanted to know him 'better' then I would, if you see what I mean
(Andrew, 21, 9 March 1998).
Andrew's view of himself as being
'easy-going', is perhaps debatable, given some of the other things he says about
himself. It is interesting however, that his father had the greatest influence
on him and yet Andrew acknowledges that he does not 'know' him very much.
Unfortunately, before I was able to explore this issue much further, Andrew left
the study and I was no longer able to converse with him. Andrew was still
provided me with 'reliable' information however, and I reasoned that perhaps
'knowing' your father is not actually a necessary requirement of 'good'
parenting, nor does it necessarily promote a better relationship between father
and son, in this case. As Andrew himself pointed out,
In general ... I
love my family to bits and can't think of anything I'd really want to change
about them, because then they wouldn't be who they are (Andrew, 21, 9 March
1998).
It is clear that Andrew's relationship with
his parents was important in terms of their contributions to his adult masculine
identity. However, it is also apparent that his level of 'closeness' to them was
not as important when it came to his recollections about them, and his views of
the effects they may have had on that identity. Speaking to Victor about this
issue, he commented that
... I don't feel
men have to get to know their father to be a better man anymore than a woman has
to get to know her mother to be a better woman. Which is not to say that I
wouldn't have liked that kind of relationship with my father, we just [were] not
that close (Victor, 41, 4 March 1998).
My dad was an
inventor (hobby). He had several things that could have been patented had he had
the money. Its a shame he locked up his tools and never shared a lot with me, we
probably would have been a lot closer - I'm a tinkerer too (Victor, 41, 1 May
1998).
In a later conversation, Victor also remarked
that his father had been a very solitary man. He had had few, if any, male
friends, and generally stayed home rather than go out 'with the boys'. Victor
thought that he was a lot like his father in this sense, but was also sad that
he had never had a chance to 'really' talk with him before he died of
Altzheimer's disease seven years ago.
From his discussions, Victor indicated that
he had felt cut off from his father as a child, and that his thoughts about this
were crystallised by his recollections of his father never sharing his tools
with him. To Victor, this meant being deprived of a close relationship with him,
just as he was kept from sharing, and taking part in, his father's hobby. I feel
however, that Victor's acknowledged lack of self-esteem, his sense of loneliness
and of being alone, is very much tied to his sadness about the relationship that
he did not have with his father. It was also tied however to his mother, to whom
he is often loathe to visit.
For example, although he also spoke of much
sadness about his very distant and awkward relationship with his father (as a
child), as an adult he had come to be extremely averse to seeing his mother.
Whilst this may sound like many adult mother/son relationships, my reading of
our conversations was such that there was something of much greater significance
here, which Victor may not have felt comfortable discussing here. In a later
email, Victor told me that although his mother had always done what she thought
best for him, her actions were often misguided. Her need for him to be happy,
for example, led to food being used as a compensatory tool, hence a serious
weight problem began, which he still battles. He also comments that,
There was never
much affection between my parents or to me. It makes me wonder how I can be such
a closet romantic with such an upbringing [however] ... you cannot hold your
parents accountable for all the bad things that happen to you in life, but I do
think that the way we handle life's roadblocks are firmly established as a
child, and the self-esteem we develop (or fail to develop) growing up (Victor,
41, 27 May 1998).
Despite his low self-esteem, his loneliness
and his deep regrets about his experiences as a child, Victor was aware that any
changes made now, would have to be made by him.
I have learned
though that you cannot live your life pondering 'what-ifs'. You need to try and
deal with what is given you and do the best you can. Lately I have fallen short
of that philosophy and have been struggling to make a 'comeback' of sorts. It's
very hard to fight the feeling that life is over and start making 'goals' again
(Victor, 41, 27 May 1998).
Marv, although his parents are now both
deceased, was raised in what he terms as being 'an atmosphere of love', where a
family of 'huggy, kissy people' surrounded him. His father
... was the only
pharmacist in town, and my blessed Mother was a beautiful woman who had been
brought up to be a helpmate, to her husband, and a mother to me (Marv, 72, 25
February 1998).
He was brought up in a large, loving and
demonstrative family, and when he had his own children, provided them with the
same love and attention that his parents had previously done for him. This was
one of the most important aspects of Marv's life regarding family and children;
that he knew without doubt that he was loved by his parents, no matter what. He
cherishes his wife, to whom he has been married for 47 years, and dotes on his
children, who are themselves, now in their forties. He was by no means a
do-gooder throughout his life, as he freely admits, especially in his years in
the military where he was 'somewhat reckless'. However, when I asked him what he
felt had shaped his life the most, he told me this:
I would have to say
that the major influence in what I see to be me, has to be awarded to my
wonderful wife of 47 years. We met on a blind date, in 1948, after I had gone
through the terrible time of the divorce. From the first day we met, I knew that
this was the girl I was going to marry (Marv, 72, 12 May 1998).
Marv's relationships in his adult life seem
to have been greatly influenced by the dynamics of his own familial childhood
experiences. Just as his parents had contributed to the formulation and
development of his young masculine identity, his relationship with his wife and
children assisted in 'nurturing' and furthering his adult masculine identity.
Townsend argues that modern men grow up in an
entirely different environment from their fathers, but there are some positives
to this. Younger men will
... have a greater
diversity of cultural influences and a wider world view than previous
generations (Townsend 1994, p. 285).
I tend to think the opposite however, and
feel that in contemporary society, young men have too much to adapt to, too
quickly, and hence are less able to deal with the increasing rapidity of change
within the sexes. In my view, this inevitably leads to frustration, and often,
open hostility and aggression.
Andrew, who was 21 years old at the time this
study was carried out, demonstrated this confusion quite clearly. He was aware
that how he behaved was often inappropriate, but more importantly he was also
cognisant of, what he felt, was the reason for this behaviour.
I think it may be
this generation now that are feeling effects of these pushes and pulls, and
maybe this is the root cause of the so-called problem. I mean, while these
changes have been going on, I've been growing up ... its become more acceptable
for us to get drunk, eye up women and so forth, especially if you go out in a
group. If you're seen to be not joining in with the group, well that becomes a
problem. Its ok to be noisy, arrogant and aggressive, and I think its just an
instinctive reaction to the times we've grown up in. That kind of behaviour we
call being a 'lad' or laddishness (Andrew, 21, 12 March 1998).
It should be noted here that Andrew was born
and raised in the United Kingdom. From all indications, and from my discussions
with him, he is very much a part of the 'working-class' culture that Mac An
Ghaill (1994) calls the 'Macho Lads', and which Gilbert and Gilbert note is one
of the most pervasive forms of hegemonic masculinities in our societies (1998, p
124). Buchbinder notes that,
Out of the
challenges offered to men by history and the critique of masculinity has come a
fracturing of 'masculinity' as an integrated concept ... We might, therefore,
say that there have always been many masculine identities ... but also that
individual men have always had different life experiences as men ( 1994, p. 22).
In terms of the differences in masculine
identites, it is interesting that both Thomas and Midori had fathers who were
very similar in their depictions. They were both strict, seldom at home and
typical of the 1950's father who rarely, if ever, showed affection, laid down
the law and expected it to be adhered to. Kephart (1981, p. 9) argues that many
sociologists are now recognising the fact that modern families are doing a
better job in terms of affectional and emotional support than those of past
decades. Midori and Thomas, however, were both aware of the impact of their
fathers 'ways of being' on themselves and their lives, but in a way which made
them both more amenable to being open, emotional and outwardly caring, something
their fathers had never been, and something that they did not want to repeat.
Victor's father was also a very strict,
authoritarian parent, although interestingly it was his mother who '... wore the
pants in the family, [handed] out the discipline and dispensed the love ...'
(Victor, 41, 14 April 1998). In terms of how he felt about his familial lived
experiences, as they had affected him as an adult, he remarked that
It would be
ridiculous for me to say that I haven't experienced changes [in myself] ...
However, I don't feel that they were forced upon me. Changes are a apart of the
evolutionary process (Victor, 41, 28 February 1998).
I think the biggest
change in my life that I have made is to accommodate the change that women
themselves have had to make in their ever changing role in becoming an
individual and equal counterpart to [man]. The change I have made is to give
women more room to assert themselves and not make it into a powerplay situation
(Victor, 41, 6 March 1998).
Bryce, (aged 48), was I think something of an
anomaly in this study. His thoughts were difficult to interpret, given the way
he preferred to converse in terms of other things, such as music and physics.
During our conversations Bryce indicated that he was an unhappy man who had
consciously made major and often extreme decisions about who he was, how he
should live, think and behave. By this I mean that he had not just 'drifted'
into being who he was, rather he had made himself who he was, with decided
resolution. From the beginning of the data generation process, it was quite
clear that Bryce needed to make it clear that he had shaped and developed his
identity, rather than other 'external' forces or experiences. I would have liked
to have had the opportunity to pursue this issue further with Bryce, but his
work commitments and extensive travel throughout the year, plus the fact that it
seemed to be a very sensitive issue for Bryce, meant that this did not
eventuate.
In this chapter there is evidence that these
men are aware of the constant emotional pressures that Western societies place
on them as both fathers and sons. They are aware of the fact that these
pressures are changing and contested, that the pressures of the past are
different to the pressures of the present. They also realise, however, that
these pressures 'co-exist' in contemporary society, which means greater
confusion and frustration in terms of how they should 'be' as fathers or sons,
as both pressure forms dictate different behavioural expectations. From my
discussions on this issue with my co-investigators, it is clear however, that
parental relationships play a significant role in men's sense of selves, in
their ability to express their emotions and in their perception of themselves as
men.
![]()
Author
: Caroline M Bennett
Copyright © 1998. All rights reserved.
Revised: June 09, 2000
.